ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04563

EBF Holdings, LLC v Defiant Arms, L.L.C.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04563

Holding The court held that the revenue purchase agreement was not a usurious loan because repayment was contingent rather than absolute. While the plaintiff met its burden for breach of contract against Defiant Arms, it failed to establish that the guarantor was liable for the specific breach alleged.

The court’s words

Unless a principal sum advanced is repayable absolutely, the transaction is not a loan

2026 NY Slip Op 04563, at the official text

Seller going bankrupt or going out of business, in and of itself, does not constitute a breach of this agreement

2026 NY Slip Op 04563, at the official text

Failure to make such showing requires denial of the motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers

2026 NY Slip Op 04563, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedJuly 24, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 04563
Area of lawContracts and Commercial
WeekWeek ending July 25, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04563
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id229

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, EBF Holdings, LLC v Defiant Arms, L.L.C., 2026 NY Slip Op 04563 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04563/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published July 24, 2026. Updated July 24, 2026.