ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04588

Matter of Brady J. S. v Darla A. B.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04588

Holding The court affirmed the Family Court’s order granting joint custody with designated zones of influence and its finding of civil contempt against the maternal grandparents. The appellate court determined that the child’s refusal to visit the father was the result of a prolonged campaign of alienation waged by the grandparents, rather than the child’s independent choice.

The court’s words

the child's refusal to visit the father is the result of a prolonged campaign of alienation waged against him by the grandparents

2026 NY Slip Op 04588, at the official text

the father has never laid a hand on the child or even threatened to do so, and the child has never been harmed in his care

2026 NY Slip Op 04588, at the official text

the grandparents have mounted a campaign to interfere with the father's relationship with the child, and we conclude that the child's refusal to spend time with her father is the result of that campaign of alienation

2026 NY Slip Op 04588, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedJuly 24, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 04588
Area of lawFamily Law
WeekWeek ending July 25, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04588
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id340

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Brady J. S. v Darla A. B., 2026 NY Slip Op 04588 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04588/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published July 24, 2026. Updated July 24, 2026.