ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04596

People v Johnson

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04596

Holding The court affirmed the denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds, determining that a 15-day delay was excludable because it pertained solely to a codefendant’s suppression motion. The People’s readiness for trial in the defendant’s case was not affected by the delay in the codefendant’s proceedings.

The court’s words

the court properly determined that those 15 days could not be charged to the People inasmuch as that delay did not pertain to defendant's case

2026 NY Slip Op 04596, at the official text

the People's delay in a codefendant's case had no bearing on the People's readiness for trial in a separate defendant's case

2026 NY Slip Op 04596, at the official text

the motion was under consideration by the court as of that time, allowing the exclusion of the relevant 15 days pursuant to CPL 30.30 (4) (a)

2026 NY Slip Op 04596, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedJuly 24, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 04596
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending July 25, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04596
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id364
Related recordsPeople v Johnson, 2026 NY Slip Op 05688; People v Johnson, 2026 NY Slip Op 04643

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Johnson, 2026 NY Slip Op 04596 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04596/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published July 24, 2026. Updated July 24, 2026.