Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04599
People v Forshey
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04599
Holding The court affirmed the judgment, holding that the defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal precluded review of the factual sufficiency of his plea and that his remaining claims regarding the voluntariness of the plea and grand jury restraints were unpreserved for appellate review. The court declined to exercise its discretion to review the claim of improper use of visible restraints during the grand jury proceeding in the interest of justice.
The court’s words
we conclude that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is valid
2026 NY Slip Op 04599, at the official text
defendant's contentions regarding the sufficiency of the factual colloquy are precluded by the valid waiver
2026 NY Slip Op 04599, at the official text
we conclude that they are not preserved for our review inasmuch as defendant
2026 NY Slip Op 04599, at the official text
we decline to exercise our power to review those contentions as a matter of discretion
2026 NY Slip Op 04599, at the official text
there is no evidence that the plea bargaining process was infected by
2026 NY Slip Op 04599, at the official text
we decline to exercise our discretion to hold this appeal in abeyance
2026 NY Slip Op 04599, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | July 24, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 04599 |
| Area of law | Criminal Procedure |
| Week | Week ending July 25, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04599 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 373 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Forshey, 2026 NY Slip Op 04599 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04599/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works