ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04603

Newton v Vancheri

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04603

Holding The court held that the two-day lapse between the theft and the accident did not legally extinguish the claim under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 (a). However, the claim under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 was dismissed because the plaintiff’s concession that the vehicle was stolen rebutted the presumption of owner consent.

The court’s words

the submissions on defendants' motion do not show as a matter of law that the lapse of time between the theft and the accident

2026 NY Slip Op 04603, at the official text

plaintiff did not state a claim under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 because his concession that the vehicle was stolen rebutted the presumption

2026 NY Slip Op 04603, at the official text

the purpose of that statute is twofold: (1) as a public safety measure designed to protect life and property of others

2026 NY Slip Op 04603, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedJuly 24, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 04603
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending July 25, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04603
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id384

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Newton v Vancheri, 2026 NY Slip Op 04603 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04603/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published July 24, 2026. Updated July 24, 2026.