Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04603
Newton v Vancheri
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04603
Holding The court held that the two-day lapse between the theft and the accident did not legally extinguish the claim under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 (a). However, the claim under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 was dismissed because the plaintiff’s concession that the vehicle was stolen rebutted the presumption of owner consent.
The court’s words
the submissions on defendants' motion do not show as a matter of law that the lapse of time between the theft and the accident
2026 NY Slip Op 04603, at the official text
plaintiff did not state a claim under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 because his concession that the vehicle was stolen rebutted the presumption
2026 NY Slip Op 04603, at the official text
the purpose of that statute is twofold: (1) as a public safety measure designed to protect life and property of others
2026 NY Slip Op 04603, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | July 24, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 04603 |
| Area of law | Personal Injury and Negligence |
| Week | Week ending July 25, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04603 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 384 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Newton v Vancheri, 2026 NY Slip Op 04603 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04603/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works