Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04618
People v Curtis
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04618
Holding The court affirmed the judgment, holding that the defendant’s challenge to the enhanced sentence was not preserved for review because he failed to object or move to withdraw his plea. Additionally, the court determined that the enhanced sentence was not unduly harsh or severe.
The court’s words
is not preserved for our review because defendant did not object to the enhanced sentence, nor did he move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction
2026 NY Slip Op 04618, at the official text
we nevertheless conclude that the enhanced sentence is not unduly harsh or severe
2026 NY Slip Op 04618, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | July 24, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 04618 |
| Area of law | Criminal Law |
| Week | Week ending July 25, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04618 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 419 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Curtis, 2026 NY Slip Op 04618 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04618/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works