Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04656
Partners & Napier Inc. v DeRoller
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04656
Holding The appeal is dismissed as moot except for demands 13, 14, and 15, where the order is affirmed because the lower court did not abuse its discretion in directing the production of material and necessary documents. The court rejected the argument that the order was issued sua sponte, noting the relief was requested in the motion papers and supported by the broad discretion inherent in supervising discovery.
The court’s words
An appeal from a discovery order is rendered moot . . . when the disputed material is disclosed before the appeal is decided
2026 NY Slip Op 04656, at the official text
a plain reading of [the] motion papers placed [the nonmoving party] on notice of the relief being requested
2026 NY Slip Op 04656, at the official text
full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action
2026 NY Slip Op 04656, at the official text
The test is one of usefulness and reason
2026 NY Slip Op 04656, at the official text
we cannot conclude that the information demanded in paragraphs 13, 14, and 15 of the notices to produce directed to the individual defendants is not material and necessary
2026 NY Slip Op 04656, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | July 24, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 04656 |
| Area of law | Civil Procedure |
| Week | Week ending July 25, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04656 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 495 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Partners & Napier Inc. v DeRoller, 2026 NY Slip Op 04656 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04656/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works