ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04664

People v Bynum

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04664

Holding The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the vehicle stop was supported by probable cause based on a BOLO bulletin and that the subsequent inventory search was lawful and not a pretext. Additionally, the court found that the defendant did not unequivocally invoke his right to remain silent and validly waived his Miranda rights during the custodial interview.

The court’s words

the police lawfully initiated a stop of defendant's vehicle based on a "be-on-the-lookout" (BOLO) bulletin

2026 NY Slip Op 04664, at the official text

the inventory search "was in accordance with procedure and resulted in a meaningful inventory list"

2026 NY Slip Op 04664, at the official text

defendant failed to clearly communicate a desire to cease all questioning indefinitely

2026 NY Slip Op 04664, at the official text

supports the court's determination that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his Miranda rights

2026 NY Slip Op 04664, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedJuly 24, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 04664
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending July 25, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04664
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id511

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Bynum, 2026 NY Slip Op 04664 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04664/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published July 24, 2026. Updated July 24, 2026.