Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04670
Matter of Michael J.L.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04670
Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the termination of the father’s parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, finding that the petitioner met its burden of showing diligent efforts while the father failed to plan for the child’s future. The court also rejected the father’s due process and bias claims, noting the bias argument was unpreserved.
The court’s words
petitioner met its burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that it exercised diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parent-child relationship
2026 NY Slip Op 04670, at the official text
the father failed to plan for the child's future
2026 NY Slip Op 04670, at the official text
the father failed to obtain suitable housing and failed to make adequate progress in the parenting and mental health services
2026 NY Slip Op 04670, at the official text
the record supports the court's determination that termination of [his] parental rights is in the best interests of the child
2026 NY Slip Op 04670, at the official text
that contention is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as he did not file a motion for the court to recuse
2026 NY Slip Op 04670, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | July 24, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 04670 |
| Area of law | Family Law |
| Week | Week ending July 25, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04670 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 523 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Michael J.L., 2026 NY Slip Op 04670 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04670/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works