Appellate Division, Second Department · September 2, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05153
Aurora Loan Services, LLC v Miller
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05153
This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.
Holding The Supreme Court erred in dismissing the complaint as abandoned because the plaintiff filed a request for judicial intervention within one year of the defendant’s default, satisfying CPLR 3215(c). The court reversed the dismissal, granted the motion to substitute the new property owner as a defendant, and remitted the matter for a determination on the remaining motion branches.
The court’s words
the filing of a request for judicial intervention that seeks a residential mortgage foreclosure settlement conference as mandated by CPLR 3408 constitutes the taking of proceedings under CPLR 3215(c)
2026 NY Slip Op 05153, at the official text
it was not required to proffer a reasonable excuse or demonstrate a potentially meritorious cause of action
2026 NY Slip Op 05153, at the official text
the Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 1018 and, in effect, CPLR 1021 and 3025(b)
2026 NY Slip Op 05153, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 2, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05153 |
| Area of law | Mortgage Foreclosure · Civil Procedure |
| Week | Week ending September 5, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05153 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 227 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Aurora Loan Services, LLC v Miller, 2026 NY Slip Op 05153 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 2, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05153/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works