Appellate Division, Second Department · September 2, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05181
Matter of C & L Concrete Corp. v Shawmut Woodworking & Supply, Inc.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05181
Holding The court affirmed the permanent stay of arbitration because the contract between the parties did not affirmatively establish an express agreement to arbitrate their disputes. Furthermore, the contractual provision allowing one party to submit matters to arbitration in a jurisdiction of its choosing was deemed void under General Business Law § 757[1].
The court’s words
Arbitration is a matter of contract, grounded in agreement of the parties
2026 NY Slip Op 05181, at the official text
a party will not be compelled to arbitrate and, thereby, to surrender the right to resort to the courts, absent evidence which affirmatively establishes that the parties expressly agreed to arbitrate their disputes
2026 NY Slip Op 05181, at the official text
All disputes are subject to mediation and Any disputes not resolved by mediation shall be resolved by litigation
2026 NY Slip Op 05181, at the official text
insofar as that same provision permits Shawmut to submit the matter to arbitration in a jurisdiction of its choosing, it is void
2026 NY Slip Op 05181, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 2, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05181 |
| Area of law | Arbitration |
| Week | Week ending September 5, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05181 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 347 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of C & L Concrete Corp. v Shawmut Woodworking & Supply, Inc., 2026 NY Slip Op 05181 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 2, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05181/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works