ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · September 10, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05241

Riley v Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05241

Holding The court held that a permanent staircase qualifies as a statutory safety device under Labor Law § 240(1) when it is the sole means of access to the work area, even if an alternative route exists but is not viable. The court also granted conditional contractual indemnification to the general contractor based on the subcontract terms.

The court’s words

permanent staircases are not categorically excluded from Labor Law 240(1) coverage

2026 NY Slip Op 05241, at the official text

the purported alternative staircase did not present a viable means of egress for plaintiff

2026 NY Slip Op 05241, at the official text

the indemnification clause in the subcontract between JGN and ADCO was triggered

2026 NY Slip Op 05241, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedSeptember 10, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05241
Area of lawLabor Law and Construction Accidents
WeekWeek ending September 12, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05241
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id139

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Riley v Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr., 2026 NY Slip Op 05241 (Appellate Division, First Department, September 10, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05241/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 10, 2026. Updated September 10, 2026.