ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 16, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05260

Alam v Uber Tech., Inc.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05260

Holding The Appellate Division reversed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment because the defendant failed to establish that the plaintiff’s injuries were not caused by the accident. Consequently, the burden never shifted to the plaintiff to explain any gap in treatment, and triable issues of fact remained regarding serious injury.

The court’s words

the defendant failed to establish, prima facie, that the alleged injuries to the cervical and lumbar regions of the plaintiff's spine, his left shoulder, and his left knee were not caused by the accident

2026 NY Slip Op 05260, at the official text

Since the defendant failed to establish that the plaintiff's injuries were not caused by the accident, the burden never shifted to the plaintiff to explain any gap in treatment

2026 NY Slip Op 05260, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 16, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05260
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending September 19, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05260
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id440

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Alam v Uber Tech., Inc., 2026 NY Slip Op 05260 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 16, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05260/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 16, 2026. Updated September 16, 2026.