Appellate Division, Second Department · September 16, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05265
Batista v Allerton Ave Estates, LLC
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05265
Holding The defendants failed to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment because they did not eliminate triable issues of fact regarding whether the icy condition resulted from a prior storm or if the defendants had constructive notice of the pre-existing condition. Consequently, the lower court’s order granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint was reversed.
The court’s words
failed to eliminate triable issues of fact as to whether the slippery condition upon which the plaintiff fell was the result of a prior storm
2026 NY Slip Op 05265, at the official text
whether the defendants had constructive notice of the pre-existing condition
2026 NY Slip Op 05265, at the official text
the Supreme Court should have denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint without regard to the sufficiency of the opposition papers
2026 NY Slip Op 05265, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 16, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05265 |
| Area of law | Personal Injury and Negligence |
| Week | Week ending September 19, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05265 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 450 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Batista v Allerton Ave Estates, LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 05265 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 16, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05265/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works