ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 16, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05265

Batista v Allerton Ave Estates, LLC

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05265

Holding The defendants failed to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment because they did not eliminate triable issues of fact regarding whether the icy condition resulted from a prior storm or if the defendants had constructive notice of the pre-existing condition. Consequently, the lower court’s order granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint was reversed.

The court’s words

failed to eliminate triable issues of fact as to whether the slippery condition upon which the plaintiff fell was the result of a prior storm

2026 NY Slip Op 05265, at the official text

whether the defendants had constructive notice of the pre-existing condition

2026 NY Slip Op 05265, at the official text

the Supreme Court should have denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint without regard to the sufficiency of the opposition papers

2026 NY Slip Op 05265, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 16, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05265
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending September 19, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05265
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id450

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Batista v Allerton Ave Estates, LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 05265 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 16, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05265/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 16, 2026. Updated September 16, 2026.