Appellate Division, Second Department · September 16, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05270
Brandford v Brandford
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05270
Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s order holding the plaintiff in civil contempt for willfully failing to pay child support arrears and an equitable distribution award. The court found that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate financial inability to comply with the court orders, thereby justifying the contempt findings and associated incarceration directives.
The court’s words
the referee's recommendation that the plaintiff be held in civil contempt for willfully failing to pay pendente lite child support was substantially supported by the record
2026 NY Slip Op 05270, at the official text
the evidence submitted in opposition to the defendant's motions did not establish the plaintiff's financial inability to comply with the order to pay pendente lite child support
2026 NY Slip Op 05270, at the official text
the referee's decision after hearing determined the rights of the parties with respect to the equitable distribution of the martial property at issue, expressing an unequivocal mandate upon which the civil contempt finding against the plaintiff was properly based
2026 NY Slip Op 05270, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 16, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05270 |
| Area of law | Family Law |
| Week | Week ending September 19, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05270 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 460 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Brandford v Brandford, 2026 NY Slip Op 05270 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 16, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05270/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works