ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 16, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05290

Houghton v Piperaro

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05290

Holding The Appellate Division reversed the lower court’s order granting defendants’ motions to preclude evidence under CPLR 3126. The court held that the defendants failed to make a clear showing that the plaintiffs’ failure to comply with discovery demands was willful or contumacious.

The court’s words

Before a court invokes the drastic remedy of precluding a party from offering evidence at trial, there must be a clear showing that the failure to comply with court-ordered discovery was willful and contumacious

2026 NY Slip Op 05290, at the official text

The willful or contumacious character of a party's conduct can be inferred from the party's repeated failure to comply with discovery demands or orders without a reasonable excuse

2026 NY Slip Op 05290, at the official text

Here, the defendants failed to make a clear showing that the plaintiffs' failure to comply with discovery demands was willful or contumacious

2026 NY Slip Op 05290, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 16, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05290
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending September 19, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05290
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id500

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Houghton v Piperaro, 2026 NY Slip Op 05290 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 16, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05290/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 16, 2026. Updated September 16, 2026.