Appellate Division, Second Department · September 16, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05290
Houghton v Piperaro
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05290
Holding The Appellate Division reversed the lower court’s order granting defendants’ motions to preclude evidence under CPLR 3126. The court held that the defendants failed to make a clear showing that the plaintiffs’ failure to comply with discovery demands was willful or contumacious.
The court’s words
Before a court invokes the drastic remedy of precluding a party from offering evidence at trial, there must be a clear showing that the failure to comply with court-ordered discovery was willful and contumacious
2026 NY Slip Op 05290, at the official text
The willful or contumacious character of a party's conduct can be inferred from the party's repeated failure to comply with discovery demands or orders without a reasonable excuse
2026 NY Slip Op 05290, at the official text
Here, the defendants failed to make a clear showing that the plaintiffs' failure to comply with discovery demands was willful or contumacious
2026 NY Slip Op 05290, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 16, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05290 |
| Area of law | Civil Procedure |
| Week | Week ending September 19, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05290 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 500 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Houghton v Piperaro, 2026 NY Slip Op 05290 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 16, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05290/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works