Appellate Division, Second Department · September 16, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05318
NRT New York, LLC v Bespoke Real Estate, LLC
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05318
Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint, finding that the claims for breach of contract and fraudulent concealment were barred by collateral estoppel. The court determined that the issues regarding the defendants’ concealment of information were necessarily decided against the plaintiff in a prior action.
The court’s words
precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action
2026 NY Slip Op 05318, at the official text
if the issue in the second action is identical to an issue which was raised, necessarily decided and material in the first action
2026 NY Slip Op 05318, at the official text
causes of action, which were predicated upon allegations that the defendants had improperly withheld or concealed information
2026 NY Slip Op 05318, at the official text
were barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel
2026 NY Slip Op 05318, at the official text
were necessarily decided against the plaintiff in the May 5, 2020 order granting the prior action defendant's cross-motion
2026 NY Slip Op 05318, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 16, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05318 |
| Area of law | Civil Procedure |
| Week | Week ending September 19, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05318 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 556 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, NRT New York, LLC v Bespoke Real Estate, LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 05318 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 16, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05318/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works