ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 16, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05321

Olivares v Andacky

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05321

Holding The court affirmed the summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint because the defendant established a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff was negligent for driving across multiple lanes of traffic and that the defendant had only seconds to react, negating any comparative negligence.

The court’s words

a driver with the right-of-way who has only seconds to react to a vehicle which has failed to yield is not comparatively negligent for failing to avoid the collision

2026 NY Slip Op 05321, at the official text

the plaintiff was negligent in driving his vehicle out of the gas station and directly across two or three southbound lanes, through a gap in traffic

2026 NY Slip Op 05321, at the official text

both the plaintiff and the defendant saw each other's vehicles only a second before the impact occurred and that the defendant was not at fault

2026 NY Slip Op 05321, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 16, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05321
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending September 19, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05321
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id562

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Olivares v Andacky, 2026 NY Slip Op 05321 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 16, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05321/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 16, 2026. Updated September 16, 2026.