ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 16, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05324

People v Harley

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05324

Holding The court vacated the duration of the orders of protection because they exceeded the maximum period permissible under CPL 530.13(4)(A) by failing to credit jail time served. The matter was remitted for a new determination of the duration, while the orders remain in effect pending that determination.

The court’s words

the duration of the orders of protection exceeded the maximum period permissible under CPL 530.13(4)(A)

2026 NY Slip Op 05324, at the official text

the Supreme Court did not announce the duration at either the plea or sentencing proceedings

2026 NY Slip Op 05324, at the official text

the orders of protection issued at the time of sentencing did not credit the defendant for jail time served

2026 NY Slip Op 05324, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 16, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05324
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending September 19, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05324
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id568

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Harley, 2026 NY Slip Op 05324 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 16, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05324/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 16, 2026. Updated September 16, 2026.