ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 16, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05347

Visco v Riverhead Cent. Sch. Dist.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05347

Holding The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a unified trial on liability and damages because they failed to establish that the nature of the injuries was inextricably intertwined with the issue of liability. The plaintiffs also failed to demonstrate that their expert’s theory could not be adequately proven during the liability phase of a bifurcated trial.

The court’s words

The plaintiffs failed to establish that the injured plaintiff's injuries were inextricably intertwined with the question of liability or that the nature of his injuries was probative in determining how the incident occurred

2026 NY Slip Op 05347, at the official text

the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that their 'expert's theory could not adequately be proven at the liability phase of a bifurcated trial'

2026 NY Slip Op 05347, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 16, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05347
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending September 19, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05347
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id614

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Visco v Riverhead Cent. Sch. Dist., 2026 NY Slip Op 05347 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 16, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05347/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 16, 2026. Updated September 16, 2026.