Appellate Division, First Department · September 17, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05368
Matter of Wells Fargo Bank v HBK Master Fund L.P.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05368
Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s determination that payments of previously deferred principal under HAMP modifications should be treated as Subsequent Recoveries under the Pooling and Servicing Agreements. Although the payments did not fit squarely within the contractual definition, the court held they should be treated as such based on the PSAs’ structure and the parties’ course of performance.
The court’s words
the deferred principal payments should be treated as Subsequent Recoveries considering the structure of the PSAs and, more importantly, the parties' course of performance
2026 NY Slip Op 05368, at the official text
The record reflects that the Trustee consistently treated deferred principal payments as Subsequent Recoveries — although it applied the resulting write-ups to the wrong class of certificates
2026 NY Slip Op 05368, at the official text
the deferred principal payments fit within the spirit, but not the letter, of the PSAs' Subsequent Recoveries definitions
2026 NY Slip Op 05368, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 17, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05368 |
| Area of law | Contracts and Commercial · Corporate, Securities and Business |
| Week | Week ending September 19, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05368 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 133 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Wells Fargo Bank v HBK Master Fund L.P., 2026 NY Slip Op 05368 (Appellate Division, First Department, September 17, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05368/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works