ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 23, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05377

Bank of America, N.A. v Discobath Products, Inc.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05377

Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the summary judgment in favor of the bank, finding that the plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment by submitting an analyst’s affidavit with business records demonstrating the defendants’ default. The court rejected the defendants’ argument that the motion was premature because discovery had not yet occurred, noting that mere speculation about future evidence is insufficient to defeat summary judgment.

The court’s words

The mere hope or speculation that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered during the discovery process is insufficient to deny the motion

2026 NY Slip Op 05377, at the official text

the plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the affidavit of its special assets group analyst

2026 NY Slip Op 05377, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 23, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05377
Area of lawContracts and Commercial
WeekWeek ending September 26, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05377
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id148

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Bank of America, N.A. v Discobath Products, Inc., 2026 NY Slip Op 05377 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 23, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05377/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 23, 2026. Updated September 23, 2026.