Appellate Division, Second Department · September 23, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05377
Bank of America, N.A. v Discobath Products, Inc.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05377
Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the summary judgment in favor of the bank, finding that the plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment by submitting an analyst’s affidavit with business records demonstrating the defendants’ default. The court rejected the defendants’ argument that the motion was premature because discovery had not yet occurred, noting that mere speculation about future evidence is insufficient to defeat summary judgment.
The court’s words
The mere hope or speculation that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered during the discovery process is insufficient to deny the motion
2026 NY Slip Op 05377, at the official text
the plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting the affidavit of its special assets group analyst
2026 NY Slip Op 05377, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 23, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05377 |
| Area of law | Contracts and Commercial |
| Week | Week ending September 26, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05377 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 148 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Bank of America, N.A. v Discobath Products, Inc., 2026 NY Slip Op 05377 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 23, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05377/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works