Appellate Division, Third Department · September 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05448
Matter of Goldstein v Town of Niskayuna
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05448
Holding The court annulled the termination determination because the hearing officer failed to make sufficiently specific factual findings to permit meaningful review. The officer did not explain the basis for sustaining each specification of misconduct or resolve sharp factual disputes regarding the petitioner’s culpability.
The court’s words
As the Hearing Officer here did not provide the requisite specificity, we annul the determination and remit for further proceedings.
2026 NY Slip Op 05448, at the official text
The Hearing Officer failed to discuss each misconduct specification separately and never stated the factual findings he relied upon to establish each finding of guilt.
2026 NY Slip Op 05448, at the official text
Absent specific factual findings as to what occurred and an explanation of the basis for sustaining each specification, we cannot determine whether substantial evidence supports the determination.
2026 NY Slip Op 05448, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Third Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 24, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05448 |
| Area of law | Employment and Discrimination |
| Week | Week ending September 26, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05448 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 377 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Goldstein v Town of Niskayuna, 2026 NY Slip Op 05448 (Appellate Division, Third Department, September 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05448/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works