ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · September 29, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05481

Matter of Lorica Asset Mgt. LLC v Steele

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05481

Holding The court affirmed the denial of the petition to compel arbitration before a specific AAA commercial panel arbitrator because the agreement did not specify that requirement. The court held that interpreting AAA rules and amendments is committed to the arbitrator, and the challenge was not ripe because AAA had not issued a final determination.

The court’s words

the dispute resolution clause at issue here does not specify any requirement that disputes be arbitrated before a particular type of arbitrator or panel

2026 NY Slip Op 05481, at the official text

Interpretation of AAA rules, both as they existed at the time of contracting and as amended at the time of a party's arbitration demand, is a matter committed to AAA or the arbitrator, not the courts

2026 NY Slip Op 05481, at the official text

the issue is not ripe. The record does not show that AAA issued a final determination as to petitioner's arguments

2026 NY Slip Op 05481, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedSeptember 29, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05481
Area of lawArbitration
WeekWeek ending October 3, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05481
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id656

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Lorica Asset Mgt. LLC v Steele, 2026 NY Slip Op 05481 (Appellate Division, First Department, September 29, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05481/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 29, 2026. Updated September 29, 2026.