Appellate Division, First Department · September 29, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05491
People v Miranda
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05491
Holding The court affirmed the adjudication of the defendant as a level two sexually violent offender, finding that the trial court properly declined a downward departure. The appellate court determined that the defendant’s mitigating factors, including treatment completion and health issues, were adequately accounted for by the risk assessment and outweighed by the seriousness of his conduct.
The court’s words
The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure
2026 NY Slip Op 05491, at the official text
Defendant's completion of sex offender treatment, the fact that he had not committed any prior violent or sex offenses, and his successful completion of his sentence and treatment were adequately accounted for by the risk assessment instrument
2026 NY Slip Op 05491, at the official text
defendant's age at the time of the SORA hearing does not establish that he has only a minimal risk of reoffense
2026 NY Slip Op 05491, at the official text
the claimed mitigating factors were outweighed by the seriousness of defendant's sexual conduct against two young children
2026 NY Slip Op 05491, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 29, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05491 |
| Area of law | Sex Offender Registration · Criminal Law |
| Week | Week ending October 3, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05491 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 666 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Miranda, 2026 NY Slip Op 05491 (Appellate Division, First Department, September 29, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05491/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works