ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 30, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05521

Herrera v Almonte-Hernandez

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05521

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding The appellate court affirmed the denial of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment because the submitted evidence contained conflicting facts regarding the cause of the accident. Consequently, the defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law.

The court’s words

provided conflicting evidence as to the material facts surrounding the incident and, thus, failed to establish the Raymour defendants' prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law

2026 NY Slip Op 05521, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 30, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05521
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending October 3, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05521
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id696

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Herrera v Almonte-Hernandez, 2026 NY Slip Op 05521 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 30, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05521/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 30, 2026. Updated September 30, 2026.