Appellate Division, Second Department · September 30, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05538
Matter of Monahan v Zindman
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05538
Holding The Family Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain the family offense petition because the parties did not share an intimate relationship as defined by statute. The court reversed the lower court’s order of fact-finding and disposition, dismissing the proceeding.
The court’s words
The Family Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and thus, it 'cannot exercise powers beyond those granted to it by statute'
2026 NY Slip Op 05538, at the official text
the parties have no direct relationship and are connected only through a third party, who is the petitioner's former boyfriend and the appellant's son
2026 NY Slip Op 05538, at the official text
the parties never resided together and their contact with one another was minimal and related only to a few visits between the appellant and the petitioner's daughter
2026 NY Slip Op 05538, at the official text
the parties do not have an intimate relationship within the meaning of Family Court Act § 812(1)(e)
2026 NY Slip Op 05538, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 30, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05538 |
| Area of law | Family Law |
| Week | Week ending October 3, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05538 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 713 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Monahan v Zindman, 2026 NY Slip Op 05538 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 30, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05538/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works