Appellate Division, Second Department · September 30, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05554
People v Herrnkind
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05554
Holding The appeal regarding the denial of resentencing under the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act was dismissed as academic because the defendant had already served her sentence. The court affirmed the denial of the motion to seal records and proceed anonymously, finding the defendant failed to demonstrate compelling circumstances or establish she was a victim of a sex offense.
The court’s words
her contentions regarding her entitlement to resentencing under the DVSJA have been rendered academic, as she has already served the challenged sentence
2026 NY Slip Op 05554, at the official text
the defendant failed to establish that she was the victim of a sex offense as defined by Civil Rights Law § 50-b
2026 NY Slip Op 05554, at the official text
she failed to demonstrate compelling circumstances to seal the record of the motion, as the majority of the information contained therein was already made public
2026 NY Slip Op 05554, at the official text
the defendant submitted an attorney affirmation that made only a brief statement that the defendant might suffer further mental harm if her identity was revealed
2026 NY Slip Op 05554, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 30, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05554 |
| Area of law | Criminal Procedure |
| Week | Week ending October 3, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05554 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 729 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Herrnkind, 2026 NY Slip Op 05554 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 30, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05554/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works