Appellate Division, Second Department · September 30, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05557
People v Perez
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05557
Holding The appellate court affirmed the defendant’s convictions for assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, finding the evidence legally sufficient and the verdict not against the weight of the evidence. The court also rejected the defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and vindictive sentencing.
The court’s words
we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted with the requisite intent to cause physical injury to the complainant
2026 NY Slip Op 05557, at the official text
we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt on the charge of assault in the second degree was not against the weight of the evidence
2026 NY Slip Op 05557, at the official text
the court providently exercised its discretion in determining that there was no good cause shown for the defendant's requests, made through his counsel, to relieve his assigned counsel
2026 NY Slip Op 05557, at the official text
the record fails to establish that the sentence imposed was vindictive or that the County Court penalized the defendant for exercising his right to proceed to trial
2026 NY Slip Op 05557, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 30, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05557 |
| Area of law | Criminal Law |
| Week | Week ending October 3, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05557 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 732 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Perez, 2026 NY Slip Op 05557 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 30, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05557/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works