Appellate Division, First Department · October 1, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05610
People v Schiff
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05610
Holding The court affirmed the conviction and sentence, finding that the defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal was invalid because the court failed to adequately explain the nature of the waiver and confirm the defendant’s understanding. However, the court declined to reach the defendant’s other claims regarding sentencing and plea conditions because they were not preserved for appellate review.
The court’s words
neither the court nor defense counsel made clear on the record that defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from the numerous other trial rights automatically forfeited upon pleading guilty
2026 NY Slip Op 05610, at the official text
never adequately explained the nature of the waiver or the rights that defendant was waiving
2026 NY Slip Op 05610, at the official text
actually signed the written form and was aware of its content
2026 NY Slip Op 05610, at the official text
failed to preserve his claims that the court denied him his statutory right to speak at sentencing and violated his due process rights by failing to conduct any inquiry into whether he violated a condition of the plea by failing to complete community service
2026 NY Slip Op 05610, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 1, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05610 |
| Area of law | Criminal Law |
| Week | Week ending October 3, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05610 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 784 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Schiff, 2026 NY Slip Op 05610 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 1, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05610/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works