Appellate Division, Fourth Department · October 2, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05626
People v Griffin
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05626
This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.
Holding The court affirmed the conviction, finding no abuse of discretion in denying the motion to withdraw the guilty plea because the defendant’s statements during the plea colloquy contradicted his claim of intoxication. The court also rejected the recusal claim and determined the sentence was not unduly harsh or severe.
The court’s words
defendant's statements during the plea colloquy belie his claim that he was intoxicated at the time of the plea proceeding
2026 NY Slip Op 05626, at the official text
that defendant's factual allocution was lucid and detailed and that defendant understood both the nature of the proceedings
2026 NY Slip Op 05626, at the official text
the court permitted defendant to call witnesses and conduct an evidentiary hearing; he simply elected not to do so
2026 NY Slip Op 05626, at the official text
the court did not abuse its discretion in failing to recuse itself
2026 NY Slip Op 05626, at the official text
we conclude that defendant's sentence is not unduly harsh or severe
2026 NY Slip Op 05626, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 2, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05626 |
| Area of law | Criminal Procedure |
| Week | Week ending October 3, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05626 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 824 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Griffin, 2026 NY Slip Op 05626 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, October 2, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05626/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works