ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · October 2, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05638

Stang v Shenoy

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05638

Holding The court vacated the lower court’s order prohibiting questions regarding a specific medical report and the defendant’s health condition relative to it, finding that such limitations abused discretion by potentially precluding relevant testimony. The court determined that the report was not protected by statutory privilege because it had been disclosed to the public in a separate action.

The court’s words

the limitation could result in the preclusion of testimony that would be relevant at trial or in preparation for trial

2026 NY Slip Op 05638, at the official text

because the written report of Dr. Sawyer was disclosed to the public at large by defendant in a separate action, the report is not protected by the statutory privilege

2026 NY Slip Op 05638, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedOctober 2, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05638
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending October 3, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05638
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id837

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Stang v Shenoy, 2026 NY Slip Op 05638 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, October 2, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05638/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 2, 2026. Updated October 2, 2026.