Appellate Division, Fourth Department · October 2, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05638
Stang v Shenoy
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05638
Holding The court vacated the lower court’s order prohibiting questions regarding a specific medical report and the defendant’s health condition relative to it, finding that such limitations abused discretion by potentially precluding relevant testimony. The court determined that the report was not protected by statutory privilege because it had been disclosed to the public in a separate action.
The court’s words
the limitation could result in the preclusion of testimony that would be relevant at trial or in preparation for trial
2026 NY Slip Op 05638, at the official text
because the written report of Dr. Sawyer was disclosed to the public at large by defendant in a separate action, the report is not protected by the statutory privilege
2026 NY Slip Op 05638, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 2, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05638 |
| Area of law | Civil Procedure |
| Week | Week ending October 3, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05638 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 837 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Stang v Shenoy, 2026 NY Slip Op 05638 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, October 2, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05638/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works