ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · October 2, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05652

People v Banks

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05652

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the lower court properly denied the suppression motion because the defendant’s unsworn, conclusory assertions failed to raise a factual dispute. Additionally, the court found no abuse of discretion in denying judicial diversion due to the lack of connection between the defendant’s criminal behavior and substance abuse.

The court’s words

defendant's omnibus motion papers contained only unsworn, conclusory factual assertions of defense counsel

2026 NY Slip Op 05652, at the official text

the court did not abuse its discretion in determining that defendant was not an appropriate candidate for the judicial diversion program

2026 NY Slip Op 05652, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedOctober 2, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05652
Area of lawCriminal Law
WeekWeek ending October 3, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05652
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id851

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Banks, 2026 NY Slip Op 05652 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, October 2, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05652/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 2, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026.