ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · October 2, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05657

People v Rodgers

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05657

Holding The court affirmed the conviction for assault in the first degree, rejecting the defendant’s argument that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. The appellate court determined that the jury’s credibility determinations regarding the victim’s testimony were entitled to great deference, particularly given the victim’s explanation for prior recantations.

The court’s words

a different verdict would not have been unreasonable inasmuch as this case rests largely on the jury's credibility findings

2026 NY Slip Op 05657, at the official text

The victim's testimony was not 'so inconsistent or unbelievable as to render it incredible as a matter of law'

2026 NY Slip Op 05657, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedOctober 2, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05657
Area of lawCriminal Law
WeekWeek ending October 3, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05657
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id856

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Rodgers, 2026 NY Slip Op 05657 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, October 2, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05657/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 2, 2026. Updated October 2, 2026.