Appellate Division, Second Department · October 7, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05761
Cambero-Minaya v 211 Schermerhorn Dev., LLC
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05761
Holding The Appellate Division modified the lower court’s order to deny the defendants’ untimely cross-motion for summary judgment on common-law negligence and Labor Law §§ 200 and 240(1) claims, while affirming the dismissal of the Labor Law § 241(6) claim. The court also affirmed the denial of the plaintiff’s motion to amend the bill of particulars, finding no extraordinary circumstances to justify the delay after discovery was completed.
The court’s words
once discovery has been completed and the case has been certified for trial, a party will not be permitted to amend the bill of particulars except upon a showing of special and extraordinary circumstances
2026 NY Slip Op 05761, at the official text
Absent a 'satisfactory explanation for the untimeliness,' constituting good cause for the delay, an untimely summary judgment motion must be denied without consideration of the merits
2026 NY Slip Op 05761, at the official text
An untimely motion or cross motion for summary judgment may be considered by the court where a timely motion was made on nearly identical grounds
2026 NY Slip Op 05761, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 7, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05761 |
| Area of law | Personal Injury and Negligence |
| Week | Week ending October 10, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05761 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 984 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Cambero-Minaya v 211 Schermerhorn Dev., LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 05761 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 7, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05761/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works