Appellate Division, Second Department · October 7, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05765
Citibank, N.A. v Sagastume
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05765
Holding The court vacated the foreclosure judgment and dismissed the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate due diligence in service of process. The process server did not make genuine inquiries about the defendant’s whereabouts before resorting to affix and mail service.
The court’s words
The failure to serve process in an action leaves the court without personal jurisdiction over the defendant, and all subsequent proceedings are thereby rendered null and void
2026 NY Slip Op 05765, at the official text
To satisfy the 'due diligence' requirement, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the process server made genuine inquiries about the defendant's whereabouts and place of employment
2026 NY Slip Op 05765, at the official text
the doctrine of laches cannot be used to defeat an application to vacate a judgment that was issued in the absence of personal jurisdiction
2026 NY Slip Op 05765, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 7, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05765 |
| Area of law | Civil Procedure |
| Week | Week ending October 10, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05765 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 988 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Citibank, N.A. v Sagastume, 2026 NY Slip Op 05765 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 7, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05765/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works