ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 7, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05774

Hyejun Cho v New York City Tr. Auth.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05774

Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint against the transit defendants, finding that they established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by showing the plaintiff’s driver violated traffic laws and was the sole proximate cause of the accident. The surveillance video conclusively established that the bus driver had the right-of-way and insufficient time to react, negating any triable issue of fact regarding comparative negligence.

The court’s words

the NYCTA defendants had the right-of-way, that Wu violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1163 when he failed to yield

2026 NY Slip Op 05774, at the official text

a driver with the right-of-way who has only seconds to react to a vehicle which has failed to yield is not comparatively negligent

2026 NY Slip Op 05774, at the official text

the bus surveillance video recording, which conclusively established that Wu was the sole proximate cause of the accident

2026 NY Slip Op 05774, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 7, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05774
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending October 10, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05774
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id997

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Hyejun Cho v New York City Tr. Auth., 2026 NY Slip Op 05774 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 7, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05774/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 7, 2026. Updated October 7, 2026.