ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 7, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05779

Martinez v Equinox Holdings, Inc.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05779

Holding The court affirmed the order compelling arbitration because the arbitration clause was separable from the substantive provisions of the membership agreement. The plaintiff’s argument that the agreement was void due to Health Club Act violations did not render the arbitration clause itself unenforceable.

The court’s words

A party trying to avoid an arbitration clause must therefore show that the arbitration clause itself, not the overall agreement, was . . . unenforceable

2026 NY Slip Op 05779, at the official text

the arbitration provision remained enforceable, notwithstanding the alleged illegality of the agreement

2026 NY Slip Op 05779, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 7, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05779
Area of lawArbitration
WeekWeek ending October 10, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05779
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1002

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Martinez v Equinox Holdings, Inc., 2026 NY Slip Op 05779 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 7, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05779/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 7, 2026. Updated October 7, 2026.