ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 7, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05785

Matter of Covington

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05785

Holding The Surrogate’s Court erred in dismissing the petition without a hearing because the verified allegations indicated the testator’s intent was not clear and unambiguous. The matter was remitted to allow the petitioner the opportunity to submit proof to establish the decedent’s intent.

The court’s words

The cardinal rule of construction of a will is to carry out the intent of the testator

2026 NY Slip Op 05785, at the official text

The heirs of a testator are favored by the policy of the law and cannot be disinherited upon mere conjecture

2026 NY Slip Op 05785, at the official text

the Surrogate's Court should have held a hearing to give the petitioner the opportunity to submit proof to establish the decedent's intent

2026 NY Slip Op 05785, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 7, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05785
Area of lawTrusts, Estates and Guardianship
WeekWeek ending October 10, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05785
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1008

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Covington, 2026 NY Slip Op 05785 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 7, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05785/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 7, 2026. Updated October 7, 2026.