Appellate Division, Second Department · October 7, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05796
Matter of Sanders v Ellis
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05796
Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the putative grandmother’s petition, holding that while she established biological standing, equitable considerations did not warrant judicial intervention to grant visitation. The court found that the mother’s objections were well-founded and that the prior visitation order did not independently confer standing.
The court’s words
a putative grandparent may petition for visitation as long as he or she establishes by clear and convincing evidence that he or she is the child's biological grandparent
2026 NY Slip Op 05796, at the official text
the statute provides a procedural mechanism for grandparents to acquire standing to seek visitation with a minor grandchild
2026 NY Slip Op 05796, at the official text
an essential part of the inquiry is the nature and extent of the grandparent-grandchild relationship
2026 NY Slip Op 05796, at the official text
the mother's objections to visitation were well founded, particularly in light of the mother's concerns regarding the child's safety
2026 NY Slip Op 05796, at the official text
the visitation order, standing alone, does not confer standing
2026 NY Slip Op 05796, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 7, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05796 |
| Area of law | Family Law |
| Week | Week ending October 10, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05796 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1019 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Sanders v Ellis, 2026 NY Slip Op 05796 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 7, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05796/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works