ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 7, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05806

People v Degraffenried

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05806

Holding The court affirmed the judgments, finding that the defendant violated a valid plea condition by contradicting his sworn admissions during a probation interview, which justified an enhanced sentence. Additionally, the court held that the defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal precluded review of the sentence’s excessiveness.

The court’s words

Conditions imposed as part of a plea arrangement are valid if the parties agree to them and they do not violate any statute or contravene public policy

2026 NY Slip Op 05806, at the official text

the violation of an explicit and objective plea condition that was accepted by the defendant can result in the imposition of an enhanced sentence

2026 NY Slip Op 05806, at the official text

the court properly imposed an enhanced sentence based upon the defendant's violation of a condition of his plea agreement

2026 NY Slip Op 05806, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 7, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05806
Area of lawCriminal Law
WeekWeek ending October 10, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05806
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1029

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Degraffenried, 2026 NY Slip Op 05806 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 7, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05806/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 7, 2026. Updated October 7, 2026.