ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 7, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05811

People v Jorge

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05811

Holding The court reversed the conviction because the trial court failed to conduct a sufficient inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the defendant’s absence before proceeding with the trial. The record did not establish that the defendant deliberately absented himself to forfeit his right to be present, nor did it show the court considered all appropriate factors for proceeding in absentia.

The court’s words

the court has an obligation to inquire into the surrounding circumstances to determine if the defendant's absence is deliberate

2026 NY Slip Op 05811, at the official text

the trial court must exercise its sound discretion upon consideration of all appropriate factors

2026 NY Slip Op 05811, at the official text

the record is therefore insufficient to establish that the defendant deliberately absented himself from the proceedings

2026 NY Slip Op 05811, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 7, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05811
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending October 10, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05811
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1034
Related recordsPeople v Jorge, 2026 NY Slip Op 05325

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Jorge, 2026 NY Slip Op 05811 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 7, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05811/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 7, 2026. Updated October 7, 2026.