ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 7, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05818

Rivera v Thomas

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05818

Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment because the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff could not identify the cause of her fall or that the defendant lacked notice of the hazardous condition. The court also held that the defendant’s argument regarding the triviality of the condition was improperly raised for the first time on appeal.

The court’s words

the defendant failed to establish, prima facie, that the plaintiff could not identify what caused her to fall

2026 NY Slip Op 05818, at the official text

the defendant also failed to establish, prima facie, that he maintained the property in a reasonably safe condition

2026 NY Slip Op 05818, at the official text

the condition of the driveway was trivial and thus not actionable is improperly raised for the first time on appeal

2026 NY Slip Op 05818, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 7, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05818
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending October 10, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05818
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1041

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Rivera v Thomas, 2026 NY Slip Op 05818 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 7, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05818/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 7, 2026. Updated October 7, 2026.