Appellate Division, Second Department · October 7, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05821
Rodriguez-Williams v John E. Andrus Mem., Inc.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05821
Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the complaint, finding that the nursing home was entitled to immunity under the Emergency or Disaster Treatment Protection Act (EDTPA) because the statutory requirements were met. The court further held that the plaintiff’s allegations of gross negligence and pre-pandemic negligence were insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss as they were bare legal conclusions.
The court’s words
the defendant's submissions in support of its motion, including, inter alia, the affidavit of its nursing home administrator in 2020 and the decedent's medical records, conclusively established that the defendant was entitled to immunity
2026 NY Slip Op 05821, at the official text
the allegations were no more than bare legal conclusions with no factual specificity, which were insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss
2026 NY Slip Op 05821, at the official text
the plaintiff's allegations of negligence by the defendant prior to the COVID-19 pandemic were bare legal conclusions with no factual specificity
2026 NY Slip Op 05821, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 7, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05821 |
| Area of law | Personal Injury and Negligence |
| Week | Week ending October 10, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05821 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1044 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Rodriguez-Williams v John E. Andrus Mem., Inc., 2026 NY Slip Op 05821 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 7, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05821/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works