Appellate Division, Third Department · October 8, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05831
Matter of Mulligan v Moy Constr. Corp.
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05831
Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Board’s decision establishing a causal relationship between the claimant’s heart attack and his employment, noting that the carrier’s untimely notice of controversy barred it from disputing the claimant’s evidence. The court held that the Board’s factual finding, based on credible medical evidence and witness testimony regarding physical exertion, was supported by the record.
The court’s words
the carrier was barred from pleading that no employer-employee relationship existed, that no accident occurred and that there was no injury arising out of and in the course of the employment
2026 NY Slip Op 05831, at the official text
The carrier's failure to timely file a notice of controversy requires the Board to determine, without regard to the carrier's proof, whether claimant demonstrated that the injury was work-related
2026 NY Slip Op 05831, at the official text
we discern no basis upon which to disturb its factual finding that there was sufficient, unrebutted and credible medical evidence to support a finding of a causal relationship
2026 NY Slip Op 05831, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Third Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 8, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05831 |
| Area of law | Workers’ Compensation and Unemployment |
| Week | Week ending October 10, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05831 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1064 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Mulligan v Moy Constr. Corp., 2026 NY Slip Op 05831 (Appellate Division, Third Department, October 8, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05831/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works