Appellate Division, First Department · October 8, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05850
Chen v Chen
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05850
Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s denial of a final order of protection, finding that the plaintiff failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed the family offenses of harassment and menacing. The court determined that the plaintiff’s partial recording did not corroborate her allegations of threats and that the defendant’s use of foul language did not rise to the level of the alleged offenses.
The court’s words
There is no basis to disturb the court's credibility determinations in this consolidated divorce action and family offense proceeding
2026 NY Slip Op 05850, at the official text
Plaintiff failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant committed the family offenses of harassment in the second degree
2026 NY Slip Op 05850, at the official text
The recording actually indicated that plaintiff was being physically aggressive with defendant as well and, in any event, did not demonstrate a genuine threat of harm to plaintiff
2026 NY Slip Op 05850, at the official text
Defendant's use of foul and disparaging language did not rise to the level of the alleged family offense of harassment in the second degree
2026 NY Slip Op 05850, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 8, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05850 |
| Area of law | Family Law |
| Week | Week ending October 10, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05850 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1061 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Chen v Chen, 2026 NY Slip Op 05850 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 8, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05850/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works