ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · October 8, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05854

Iberdrola Energy Projects v Oaktree Capital Mgt., L.P.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05854

Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s fraud claims because the plaintiff failed to plead detrimental reliance on misrepresentations collateral to the contract, as the alleged inducement involved pre-existing contractual obligations. Additionally, the plaintiff’s renewed challenges to the enforceability of the work-pending-dispute and nonrecourse provisions were barred by the law of the case doctrine.

The court’s words

Plaintiff failed to plead the element of detrimental reliance in support of its causes of action for fraud.

2026 NY Slip Op 05854, at the official text

the conduct into which plaintiff was allegedly induced consisted of pre-existing obligations under the EPC

2026 NY Slip Op 05854, at the official text

Any breach by defendants did not cause the dispute resolution procedures to fail of their purpose

2026 NY Slip Op 05854, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedOctober 8, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05854
Area of lawContracts and Commercial
WeekWeek ending October 10, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05854
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1069

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Iberdrola Energy Projects v Oaktree Capital Mgt., L.P., 2026 NY Slip Op 05854 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 8, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05854/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 8, 2026. Updated October 8, 2026.