Appellate Division, Second Department · October 14, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05931
Davidoff v Hershfield
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05931
Holding The court reversed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment and granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss because the promissory note lacked clear language expressly providing for the recovery of fees on fees. The court held that such a right to recover attorneys’ fees for prosecuting a claim for attorneys’ fees must be based on a specific contractual provision and cannot be implied.
The court’s words
The note did not contain clear language expressly providing for the prevailing party to recover fees on fees
2026 NY Slip Op 05931, at the official text
Given the absence of unmistakably clear intent regarding the recovery of fees on fees, a right to recover those fees should not be implied
2026 NY Slip Op 05931, at the official text
an award of attorneys' fees for the costs incurred in prosecuting a claim for an award of attorneys' fees, so called 'fees on fees,' must be based upon a specific contractual provision or statute
2026 NY Slip Op 05931, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 14, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05931 |
| Area of law | Contracts and Commercial |
| Week | Week ending October 17, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05931 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1168 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Davidoff v Hershfield, 2026 NY Slip Op 05931 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05931/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works