ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 14, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05931

Davidoff v Hershfield

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05931

Holding The court reversed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment and granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss because the promissory note lacked clear language expressly providing for the recovery of fees on fees. The court held that such a right to recover attorneys’ fees for prosecuting a claim for attorneys’ fees must be based on a specific contractual provision and cannot be implied.

The court’s words

The note did not contain clear language expressly providing for the prevailing party to recover fees on fees

2026 NY Slip Op 05931, at the official text

Given the absence of unmistakably clear intent regarding the recovery of fees on fees, a right to recover those fees should not be implied

2026 NY Slip Op 05931, at the official text

an award of attorneys' fees for the costs incurred in prosecuting a claim for an award of attorneys' fees, so called 'fees on fees,' must be based upon a specific contractual provision or statute

2026 NY Slip Op 05931, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 14, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05931
Area of lawContracts and Commercial
WeekWeek ending October 17, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05931
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1168

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Davidoff v Hershfield, 2026 NY Slip Op 05931 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05931/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 14, 2026. Updated October 14, 2026.