ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 14, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05938

GCM Funding, LLC v Pulse Nail Spa in Buford, LLC

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05938

Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s denial of the plaintiff’s second motion for summary judgment because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate good cause for making a successive motion. The court found that the plaintiff did not show why the evidence was not available during the first motion and that the motion did not fit within the narrow exception to the successive summary judgment rule.

The court’s words

Successive motions for summary judgment should not be entertained in the absence of good cause, such as a showing of newly discovered evidence

2026 NY Slip Op 05938, at the official text

the plaintiff presented no argument as to why the evidence submitted in support of its second motion was not available when it made its prior motion

2026 NY Slip Op 05938, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 14, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05938
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending October 17, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05938
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1175

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, GCM Funding, LLC v Pulse Nail Spa in Buford, LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 05938 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05938/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 14, 2026. Updated October 14, 2026.