ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 14, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05943

Hidalgo v R.R. 590 Oak Family Limited Partnership

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05943

Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240(1) claim because the defendants established that the injury was not the result of an elevation-related hazard or gravity-related risk. The plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the falling glass was caused by the absence or inadequacy of a safety device prescribed by the statute.

The court’s words

The extraordinary protections of Labor Law § 240(1) extend only to a narrow class of special hazards

2026 NY Slip Op 05943, at the official text

a plaintiff must show more than simply that an object fell causing injury to a worker

2026 NY Slip Op 05943, at the official text

the accident was not the result of an elevation-related hazard or gravity-related risk

2026 NY Slip Op 05943, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 14, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05943
Area of lawLabor Law and Construction Accidents · Personal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending October 17, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05943
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1180

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Hidalgo v R.R. 590 Oak Family Limited Partnership, 2026 NY Slip Op 05943 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05943/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 14, 2026. Updated October 14, 2026.